| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpaa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/10/2007 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
03/02/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
Internacional - A |
|
Autoria: |
SILVA, C. R.; GOMES, L. de C.; BRANDÃO, F. R. |
|
Afiliação: |
Clichenner Rodrigues Silva, Bolsista-CPAA; LEVY DE CARVALHO GOMES, CPAA; Franmir Rodrigues Brandão, Bolsista-CPAA. |
|
Título: |
Effect of feeding rate and frequency on tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) growth, production and feeding costs during the first growth phase in cages. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2007 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Aquaculture, v. 264, n. 1-4, p. 135-139, abr. 2007. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Feeding costs contributes up to 60% of the variable costs of cage culture systems. Therefore the objective of our study was to establish an optimal feeding frequency and feeding rate for rearing tambaqui in cages during the first growth phase. A factorial experiment was carried out in twelve 1 m3 fish cages, with two feeding rates (5 and 10% body weight per day ? BW/day) and two feeding frequencies (2 and 3 meals/day), over a period of 45 days. At the end of the experiment 20% of fish from each cage were sampled for length and weight measurements. Survival, feed conversion ratio, weight gain, final biomass and feeding costs were calculated. Fish that received 10% BW/day divided in 3 meals/day, presented higher growth rates in weight, length and specific growth rate, when compared to fish fed with other treatments. Fish fed 5% BW/day divided in 3 meals/day presented a lower growth rate. Production parameters evaluated also showed a better performance with fish that received 10% BW/day divided in 3 meals/day. Total cost of feeding was higher for those who received 10% BW/day divided in 3 meals/day, however, the cost of unit produced was similar to other tested treatments. This suggests that the best feeding strategy for tambaqui during the first growth phase in cages is 10% BW/day divided in 3 meals/day. |
|
Thesagro: |
Colossoma Macropomum; Crescimento; Tambaqui. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01899naa a2200181 a 4500
001 1681330
005 2020-02-03
008 2007 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSILVA, C. R.
245 $aEffect of feeding rate and frequency on tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) growth, production and feeding costs during the first growth phase in cages.
260 $c2007
520 $aFeeding costs contributes up to 60% of the variable costs of cage culture systems. Therefore the objective of our study was to establish an optimal feeding frequency and feeding rate for rearing tambaqui in cages during the first growth phase. A factorial experiment was carried out in twelve 1 m3 fish cages, with two feeding rates (5 and 10% body weight per day ? BW/day) and two feeding frequencies (2 and 3 meals/day), over a period of 45 days. At the end of the experiment 20% of fish from each cage were sampled for length and weight measurements. Survival, feed conversion ratio, weight gain, final biomass and feeding costs were calculated. Fish that received 10% BW/day divided in 3 meals/day, presented higher growth rates in weight, length and specific growth rate, when compared to fish fed with other treatments. Fish fed 5% BW/day divided in 3 meals/day presented a lower growth rate. Production parameters evaluated also showed a better performance with fish that received 10% BW/day divided in 3 meals/day. Total cost of feeding was higher for those who received 10% BW/day divided in 3 meals/day, however, the cost of unit produced was similar to other tested treatments. This suggests that the best feeding strategy for tambaqui during the first growth phase in cages is 10% BW/day divided in 3 meals/day.
650 $aColossoma Macropomum
650 $aCrescimento
650 $aTambaqui
700 1 $aGOMES, L. de C.
700 1 $aBRANDÃO, F. R.
773 $tAquaculture$gv. 264, n. 1-4, p. 135-139, abr. 2007.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental (CPAA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Catálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Algodão; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pantanal; Embrapa Rondônia; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Trigo; Embrapa Uva e Vinho. MenosCatálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Algodão; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pantanal; Embrapa Rondônia... Mostrar Todas |
|
Identificador: |
2826 |
|
Data corrente: |
09/05/2002 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/05/2002 |
|
Código do título: |
0900592 |
|
ISSN: |
0100-6967 |
|
Código CCN: |
027582-4 |
|
Título e Subtítulo: |
DIVULGACAO AGRONOMICA |
|
Entidade: |
Shell Quimica S.A. |
|
Local de publicação: |
Sao Paulo-SP |
|
Periodicidade: |
irregular |
|
Inicio de publicação: |
1959 |
|
Coleções da unidade: |
Embrapa Algodão
1961/79 (3,5-9,11,13,14-19,21-46)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Amapá
1966 (22); 1969 (27); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1975 (36); 1976 (39-41); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (46)
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental
1959 (1); 1960 (2); 1961 (3-4); 1962 (5-8); 1963 (10); 1964 (11-13); 1965 (14-17); 1966 (18-22); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (38-41); 1977 (42); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (45-46); 1980 (47)
Classificação: 632.05D518
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão
1960 (1); 1962 (6); 1963 (10); 1964 (12-13,15); 1965 (16-17); 1966 (19,22); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (38-40); 1977 (42); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (45)
Embrapa Cerrados
1959-60 (1-2); 1961 (4); 1962 (6); 1964 (11); 1965; 1966 (18-22); 1968 (24,26); 1969 (27); 1970-80 (28-47)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura
1960(1-2); 1961(3-4); 1962(5-8); 1963(9-10); 1964(11-13); 1965(14-17); 1966(18-22); 1967(23); 1968(24-26); 1969(27); 1970(28-29); 1971(30-31); 1972(32); 1973(33); 1974(34-35); 1975(36-37); 1976(38-41); 1977(42); 1978(43-44); 1979(45-46); 1980(47);
Embrapa Meio-Norte
1961 (4); 1964 (12); 1965 (14-17); 1966 (18-21); 1967 (23); 1968/78 (25-44); 1979 (45)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Pantanal
1971-80 (30,33,38-40,42-47)
Classificação: 23A
Embrapa Rondônia
1967 (23); 1969-71 (27-30); 1973-74 33-35; 1976 (39); 1978 (43-44); 1979-80 (45-47);
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Semiárido
1960 (2); 1961 (1,3); 1962 (7-8); 1965 (14-16); 1966 (20); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (39-41); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (45-46); 1980 (47);
Embrapa Soja
1965 (17); 1966(20); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (38-41); 1977 (42); 1978(43-44); 1979 (46); 1980 (47)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Trigo
1960/80 (1-2) 1960; (3-4) 1961; (5-8) 1962; (9-10) 1963; (11-13) 1964; (15-16) 1965; (18-22) 1966; (23) 1967; (24-26) 1968; (27) 1969; (28-29) 1970; (30-31) 1971; (32) 1972; (33) 1973; (34-35) 1974; (36-37) 1975; (38-41) 1976; (42) 1977; (43-44) 1978; (45-46) 1979; (47) 1980.
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Uva e Vinho
1961 (1); 1962 (8); 1963 (10); 1964 (11-13); 1965 (14-17); 1966 (18-22); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34); 1975 (35-37); 1976 (38-41); 1977 (42); 1978 (44); 1979 (45-46); 1980 (47)
Classificação: 632.05 |
|
Fechar
|
|
|
